• Register
  • Login
  • Board index ‹ Manufacturer Forums ‹ California Lightworks
  • View unanswered posts
  • View active topics

TXStorm Grow Blog

Forum ONLY for California Lightworks Grower Feedback Program
Post a reply
70 posts • Page 6 of 7 • 1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

Re: TXStorm Grow Blog

Postby SisterMaryElephant » Mon Jul 30, 2012 10:52 am

Interesting. That data is 10 years old but still relevant. I'm not sure that I agree with all of it but there is a case for some leaf trimming at different stages. My comment was referring solely to post veg stage and diseased parts. Dead rotten leaves would apply. I've never seen evidence that trimming leaves reduces stretch but I'd have to do some experimentation to verify that. As they point out, leaves are the engines of photosynthesis so I just use the tuck method that they mention last.

Now, as to your exact situation, I don't know how yellow, how big, nor how many leaves were trimmed so my advice was more generic. That said, it's your grow, of course, and you can use any methodology you prefer. Leaves usually don't yellow and die, naturally until the last 2-3 weeks of life, so you're a bit early for that. Other than that, growing is part science and part art and the "art part" leaves for a LOT of flexibility. ;)

Hope that helps...


EDIT: on a side note, I knew some of the people Ed quotes in that article from the old OverGrow forums over a decade ago and the people I knew were very knowledgeable. They certainly make good arguments but I'm still not convinced that every instance Ed talks about is appropriate for trimming leaves. In some cases, yes, they're right. In others, I'm not so sure and I'm not sure that your journal is the right place to debate the subject so if you'd like to continue discussing when and where leaf trimming is right, we should start a new thread in the MJ growers section. ;)

Disclaimer:
I still use HID and I'm NOT an LED expert. All of my LED knowledge is from other parties or research so I can't say from first hand experience one way or another. I also run a medical grow consulting business in SoCal.
SisterMaryElephant
 
Posts: 2633
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 10:05 pm

Re: TXStorm Grow Blog

Postby TXStorm » Mon Jul 30, 2012 12:49 pm

Thanks for the follow up SME... the total amount of fan leaves I trimmed off was 4.... not too many.... while on the subject of trimming , more specific topping, is it better to not top to get the largest, most potent cola? That has been my thought... thanks
TXStorm
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 8:28 am

Re: TXStorm Grow Blog

Postby SisterMaryElephant » Mon Jul 30, 2012 2:16 pm

Yeah, 4 leaves is no big deal unless the plant is tiny. ;)

Topping/fimming and other "cutting" type manipulation should be done while in veg to allow time to heal and start new growth before going to flower. I prefer to do it when they are very small and I, personally, won't cut them 1-2 weeks before flowering. If you top or fimm you trade one large cola for 2 or more smaller ones so it really depends on your grow area and style. If you're growing many small plants, like a SOG, then you probably do not want to to cut. If you're growing 1 or two large plants under a 1000w HPS (like I used to) then topping and fimming will allow the plant to get more bushy with many flowers but they're smaller, especially if head room is an issue. Then there is something in between. If you want bushier plants, yes. If you want thinner/taller plants, no. Overcrowding can cause light problems no matter how much light you have. Typically, 1 large cola will be bigger than two or more smaller ones but they might end up with the same overall weight by time you're finished if the other environmental factors are good. If your goal is the single biggest cola you probably don't want to cut them.

Disclaimer:
I still use HID and I'm NOT an LED expert. All of my LED knowledge is from other parties or research so I can't say from first hand experience one way or another. I also run a medical grow consulting business in SoCal.
SisterMaryElephant
 
Posts: 2633
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 10:05 pm

Re: TXStorm Grow Blog

Postby FireBrand » Sat Aug 04, 2012 5:56 pm

TXStorm wrote:thanks for the input....this appears to me to be a genetics thing with the stretching....the light has been ~14-16" from the plants.... and in a 32" x 32" area the SolarStorm is over rated for that coverage...


Meaning that there is more light than is needed?

Awesome thread by the way, and nice looking ladies.
FireBrand
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2012 8:16 pm

Re: TXStorm Grow Blog

Postby SisterMaryElephant » Sat Aug 04, 2012 6:24 pm

Yes, the SolarStorm-800 is rated (by the manufacturer) for a 4x4 area but I prefer more than 38.75w/sqf for our crop.

Disclaimer:
I still use HID and I'm NOT an LED expert. All of my LED knowledge is from other parties or research so I can't say from first hand experience one way or another. I also run a medical grow consulting business in SoCal.
SisterMaryElephant
 
Posts: 2633
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 10:05 pm

Re: TXStorm Grow Blog

Postby TXStorm » Wed Aug 08, 2012 1:59 am

FireBrand wrote:
TXStorm wrote:thanks for the input....this appears to me to be a genetics thing with the stretching....the light has been ~14-16" from the plants.... and in a 32" x 32" area the SolarStorm is over rated for that coverage...


Meaning that there is more light than is needed?

Awesome thread by the way, and nice looking ladies.


thanks Firebrand- yes indeed, I think the SolarStorm 800w is plenty for my tent size (GrowLab 80)....

Last edited by TXStorm on Wed Aug 08, 2012 6:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
TXStorm
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 8:28 am

Re: TXStorm Grow Blog

Postby TXStorm » Wed Aug 08, 2012 2:17 am

week 11 and day 21 of bloom of my SolarStorm trial.... a few days late with my update but not much to add.... a brief summary is (3) of (3) of the "old" bag seeds I started back in May ended up to males.... I had one outside and two in the tent when I began the bloom cycle.... so out they went as soon as they started to show the sacks.... there was a "free" seed from an order and that went outside at the beginning of the bloom as it was really too tall and with the days getting shorter now it showed itself to be male also.... so (4) out of (6) plant were male.... the "nepalese" is now 37" (from 12" at the start of bloom) and flowers are coming but at a slow rate.... it really doesn't look too good and next time around I hope for a better result with this strain.... the "white queen", while a small plant (14"), is developing thick fat buds.... sorry for the pictures under the light, I didn't catch it as the lights went out for some shots....
8-4-12 wq 1.JPG
8-4-12 wq 1.JPG (161.32 KiB) Viewed 5131 times

8-4-12 wq 2.JPG
8-4-12 wq 2.JPG (127.52 KiB) Viewed 5131 times

8-4-12 nepalese & wq 1.JPG
8-4-12 nepalese & wq 1.JPG (168 KiB) Viewed 5131 times
TXStorm
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 8:28 am

Re: TXStorm Grow Blog

Postby SisterMaryElephant » Wed Aug 08, 2012 1:29 pm

That white queen looks like it would make a good SOG plant...

Disclaimer:
I still use HID and I'm NOT an LED expert. All of my LED knowledge is from other parties or research so I can't say from first hand experience one way or another. I also run a medical grow consulting business in SoCal.
SisterMaryElephant
 
Posts: 2633
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 10:05 pm

Re: TXStorm Grow Blog

Postby TXStorm » Thu Aug 09, 2012 1:48 am

Hi SME.... I agree..... even though I didn't have a veg cycle as long as I would have preferred, which may have allowed for a fuller bushy plant, it has grown really well.... specs say 40 - 60cm tall and I and at the low end of that.... I hope to get some good pictures this weekend of the buds to show....
TXStorm
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 8:28 am

Re: TXStorm Grow Blog

Postby TXStorm » Mon Aug 13, 2012 2:32 am

SolarStorm trial week 12 and day 35 of bloom.... the "Nepalese" is just about another inch taller, almost 38" tall.... 26" in 28 days.... has anyone had another strain do this ?.... the nodes at the top are close together and flowers are forming but if it's going to thicken up I can't be sure.... the "Queen" is looking frosty and getting fatter.... it specs to a 8-9 week flower cycle so it's over half way.... the light is as high as it can be in my tent and 13" from the top of the "Nepalese" and 15" from the "Queen" with no issues....UVB have been on for 2 weeks.... feeding with Earth Juice and GO products every other feed (1/2 to 3/4 strength) at ~3-4 day intervals.... it seems to me the plants respond better to the EJ.... my close up pictures were too blurry so I need a photography lesson.... here's two of the "Queen" though.... also my trial for the SolarStorm has ended but plan to keep the light and will finish out the grow blog....
8-11-12 wq 1.JPG
8-11-12 wq 1.JPG (87.4 KiB) Viewed 5087 times

8-11-12 wq 2.JPG
8-11-12 wq 2.JPG (87.49 KiB) Viewed 5087 times
TXStorm
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 8:28 am

PreviousNext
Post a reply
70 posts • Page 6 of 7 • 1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

Return to California Lightworks

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


ABOUT LED GROW LIGHT FORUM


LED Grow Light forum is an independent forum for indoor horticulture enthusiasts using LED technology to collaborate, share tips and tricks and post their own grow light reviews and journals. Since LED technology for indoor growing is relatively new, this forum is designed to provide a candid communication realm outside the marketing and sales hype disseminated by LED grow light companies. Whether you are new to LED grow lights or a seasoned guru, you will find very useful information in the posts within this forum. Everyone is welcome to join and participate in the discussions.

LED Grow Light Forum



  • FAQ
  • The team
  • Delete all board cookies