bunch of noob questions...
Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 3:58 pm
I'm an experienced HID grower thinking of moving to LED and have been reading all the junk on the internet. I'm so turned around right now but I want to wrap my head around this as I believe LEDs are most likely the future for indoor cultivation. Questions:
1) Are these claims that you can replace a 1000W HPS with a 400W LED system? This seems unlikely but this needs to be true if the 50% energy savings claims are true.
2) Whats the deal with lenses? I assume lenses eat some useable light but do they effectively make up for this by capturing the far field light? Has any meaningful work been done on these angles or is it just one manufactures claims against another?
3) 5w vrs. 3w vrs. 2w vrs 1w - which of these is most efficient in producing good growing light. It seems like early internet thinking was that bigger was better but then moved towards 3w as the best balance of power and efficiency. Is there a scientific consensus here?
4) Light spectrums - when I started lumens of foot candles was king. Now PAR comes into the picture. There is some debate in who produces the best spectrum (if that is even knowable) but is there consensus that you need certain wavelengths? Whats the deal with UV A and B?
5) I get that quality of component is important, that heat management is important and that the actual wattage draw that is important. Are there other things that aren't on my radar?
6) Are there good information sources that aren't biased that you could point me to. I would like to understand LEDs so I can make the best choice possible for my capital.
7) Are there good examples of grow rooms that employ a mixed strategy using both HID and LED lighting? Where I live it ranges in temperature from below freezing to into the 90s. Most of the year some heat from HID would benefit me and combining the lights I already own with some new LED units could soften the blow of the additional cost.
Thanks
1) Are these claims that you can replace a 1000W HPS with a 400W LED system? This seems unlikely but this needs to be true if the 50% energy savings claims are true.
2) Whats the deal with lenses? I assume lenses eat some useable light but do they effectively make up for this by capturing the far field light? Has any meaningful work been done on these angles or is it just one manufactures claims against another?
3) 5w vrs. 3w vrs. 2w vrs 1w - which of these is most efficient in producing good growing light. It seems like early internet thinking was that bigger was better but then moved towards 3w as the best balance of power and efficiency. Is there a scientific consensus here?
4) Light spectrums - when I started lumens of foot candles was king. Now PAR comes into the picture. There is some debate in who produces the best spectrum (if that is even knowable) but is there consensus that you need certain wavelengths? Whats the deal with UV A and B?
5) I get that quality of component is important, that heat management is important and that the actual wattage draw that is important. Are there other things that aren't on my radar?
6) Are there good information sources that aren't biased that you could point me to. I would like to understand LEDs so I can make the best choice possible for my capital.
7) Are there good examples of grow rooms that employ a mixed strategy using both HID and LED lighting? Where I live it ranges in temperature from below freezing to into the 90s. Most of the year some heat from HID would benefit me and combining the lights I already own with some new LED units could soften the blow of the additional cost.
Thanks