Page 2 of 2

Re: SS 400/ChemDawg4/DR90 Journal

PostPosted: Sat Jan 25, 2014 7:55 pm
by AugustWest
I will check with California Light Works to see if they want me to return the light.

I am not wasting my time on a test that we all know the results.

I am not flipping plants at 12 inches

I know long time commercial growers who flower at 37.5 watts per sq ft. Successful folks who have been at it over 20 years routinely donating pounds to dispensaries is the bay area. Same folks run the op at 1.3 sq ft per plant.

At best we agree to disagree on watts per sq ft and plants per sq ft.

Re: SS 400/ChemDawg4/DR90 Journal

PostPosted: Sat Jan 25, 2014 8:02 pm
by SisterMaryElephant
AugustWest wrote:I will check with California Light Works to see if they want me to return the light.

I am not wasting my time on a test that we all know the results.

I am not flipping plants at 12 inches

I know long time commercial growers who flower at 37.5 watts per sq ft. Successful folks who have been at it over 20 years routinely donating pounds to dispensaries is the bay area. Same folks run the op at 1.3 sq ft per plant.

At best we agree to disagree on watts per sq ft and plants per sq ft.

CLW has nothing to do with it, I don't work for them. I don't know why they'd give you a refund either since you didn't update your journal weekly, like you agreed, or even flower for more than 3 weeks but that's up to them. :roll:

*You* claimed 50w and if you're going to say things that don't add up then you shouldn't be surprised when you get called on them.

BS, most commercial growers grow at over 50w/sqft and if you're under 40 you're not growing top-shelf product. You're right, we don't agree on w/sqft, but maybe you shouldn't have claimed 50 if you meant something else too. :roll: